VUG vs XLRE Overlap
VUG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. VUG and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 1.09%. They share 6 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by WELL, EQIX, and AMT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
VUG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. VUG and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 1.09%. They share 6 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by WELL, EQIX, and AMT.
- 1.09% weighted overlap across 6 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 74.77% of the measured overlap.
- VUG is the broader fund, while XLRE is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- VUG holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLRE holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
VUG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. VUG and XLRE do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like WELL, EQIX, and AMT.
How They Differ
VUG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. VUG is the broader fund, while XLRE is the more targeted sleeve. VUG has the lower expense ratio, while XLRE charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 74.77% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VUG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLRE is the narrower expression. VUG has the lower expense ratio, while XLRE charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 74.77% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VUG and XLRE.
| Holding | Name | VUG Wt. | XLRE Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | Welltower Inc | 0.41% | 10.58% | 0.41% |
| EQIX | Equinix Inc | 0.26% | 6.96% | 0.26% |
| AMT | American Tower Corp | 0.15% | 6.46% | 0.15% |
| O | Realty Income Corp | 0.10% | 4.85% | 0.10% |
| CSGP | CoStar Group Inc | 0.10% | 2.03% | 0.10% |
| SBAC | SBA Communications Corp | 0.08% | 2.13% | 0.08% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
VUG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are WELL, EQIX, and AMT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VUG and XLRE can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About VUG and XLRE
What is the overlap between VUG and XLRE?+
How many holdings do VUG and XLRE share?+
Is the VUG and XLRE overlap high?+
Why do VUG and XLRE overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, VUG or XLRE?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.