EFA vs XLF Overlap
EFA is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLF is a financial sector ETF from SPDR. EFA and XLF show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0%. They share 0 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by very few shared positions.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
EFA is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLF is a financial sector ETF from SPDR. EFA and XLF show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0%. They share 0 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by very few shared positions.
- 0% weighted overlap across 0 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 0% of the measured overlap.
- EFA is the broader fund, while XLF is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- EFA holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLF holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 13, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
EFA is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLF is a financial sector ETF from SPDR. EFA and XLF do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like very few shared positions.
How They Differ
EFA is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLF is a financial sector ETF from SPDR. EFA is the broader fund, while XLF is the more targeted sleeve. XLF has the lower expense ratio, while EFA charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 0% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, EFA is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLF is the narrower expression. XLF has the lower expense ratio, while EFA charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 0% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between EFA and XLF.
Why These ETFs Overlap
EFA is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLF is a financial sector ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are very few shared positions, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both EFA and XLF can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About EFA and XLF
What is the overlap between EFA and XLF?+
How many holdings do EFA and XLF share?+
Is the EFA and XLF overlap high?+
Why do EFA and XLF overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, EFA or XLF?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.