SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while VTI is a total-market U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHV and VTI show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 42%. They share 513 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BRK.B, JPM, and 30231G102.
Freshly computed.
Quick Answer
SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while VTI is a total-market U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHV and VTI show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 42%. They share 513 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BRK.B, JPM, and 30231G102.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while VTI is a total-market U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHV and VTI overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as BRK.B, JPM, and 30231G102, which explains why the score lands at 42%.
SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while VTI is a total-market U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. VTI is the broader fund, while SCHV is the more targeted sleeve. VTI has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 8.78% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VTI is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SCHV is the narrower expression. VTI has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 8.78% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHV and VTI.
| Holding | Name | SCHV Wt. | VTI Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 2.82% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.62% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
| 30231G102 | Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.97% | 1.13% | 1.13% |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 1.76% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 1.65% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| CVX | Chevron Corp | 1.11% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| ABBV | AbbVie Inc | 1.25% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 3.54% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| PG | Procter & Gamble Co/The | 1.08% | 0.54% | 0.54% |
| CAT | Caterpillar Inc | 1.32% | 0.53% | 0.53% |
SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while VTI is a total-market U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are BRK.B, JPM, and 30231G102, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both SCHV and VTI can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Go deeper
Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.
Stay informed
Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.