VBR vs XLP Overlap
VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLP is a consumer staples ETF from SPDR. VBR and XLP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2%. They share 9 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BG, CLX, and SJM.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLP is a consumer staples ETF from SPDR. VBR and XLP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2%. They share 9 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BG, CLX, and SJM.
- 2% weighted overlap across 9 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 48.8% of the measured overlap.
- VBR is the broader fund, while XLP is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- VBR holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLP holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLP is a consumer staples ETF from SPDR. VBR and XLP do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like BG, CLX, and SJM.
How They Differ
VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLP is a consumer staples ETF from SPDR. VBR is the broader fund, while XLP is the more targeted sleeve. VBR has the lower expense ratio, while XLP charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 48.8% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VBR is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLP is the narrower expression. VBR has the lower expense ratio, while XLP charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 48.8% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VBR and XLP.
| Holding | Name | VBR Wt. | XLP Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG | Bunge Global SA | 0.41% | 1.02% | 0.41% |
| CLX | Clorox Co/The | 0.32% | 0.89% | 0.32% |
| SJM | J M Smucker Co/The | 0.25% | 0.73% | 0.25% |
| CAG | Conagra Brands Inc | 0.21% | 0.54% | 0.21% |
| TAP | Molson Coors Beverage Co | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.19% |
| BF-B | Brown-Forman Corp | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.18% |
| HRL | Hormel Foods Corp | 0.17% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
| LW | Lamb Weston Holdings Inc | 0.15% | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| CPB | Campbell's Company/The | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.13% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLP is a consumer staples ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are BG, CLX, and SJM, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VBR and XLP can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About VBR and XLP
What is the overlap between VBR and XLP?+
How many holdings do VBR and XLP share?+
Is the VBR and XLP overlap high?+
Why do VBR and XLP overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, VBR or XLP?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.