VO vs XLY Overlap
VO is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. VO and XLY show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 9.7%. They share 24 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by RCL, GM, and DASH.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
VO is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. VO and XLY show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 9.7%. They share 24 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by RCL, GM, and DASH.
- 9.7% weighted overlap across 24 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 25.15% of the measured overlap.
- VO is the broader fund, while XLY is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- VO holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLY holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
VO is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. VO and XLY do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like RCL, GM, and DASH.
How They Differ
VO is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. VO is the broader fund, while XLY is the more targeted sleeve. VO has the lower expense ratio, while XLY charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 25.15% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VO is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLY is the narrower expression. VO has the lower expense ratio, while XLY charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 25.15% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VO and XLY.
| Holding | Name | VO Wt. | XLY Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCL | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 0.85% | 1.73% | 0.85% |
| GM | General Motors Co | 0.84% | 1.68% | 0.84% |
| DASH | DoorDash Inc | 0.75% | 1.52% | 0.75% |
| ROST | Ross Stores Inc | 0.66% | 1.66% | 0.66% |
| F | Ford Motor Co | 0.58% | 1.15% | 0.58% |
| CVNA | Carvana Co | 0.57% | 1.08% | 0.57% |
| YUM | Yum! Brands Inc | 0.46% | 1.06% | 0.46% |
| EBAY | eBay Inc | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.44% |
| DHI | DR Horton Inc | 0.42% | 0.95% | 0.42% |
| HLT | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | 0.37% | 1.66% | 0.37% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
VO is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are RCL, GM, and DASH, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VO and XLY can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About VO and XLY
What is the overlap between VO and XLY?+
How many holdings do VO and XLY share?+
Is the VO and XLY overlap high?+
Why do VO and XLY overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, VO or XLY?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.